Last Updated: 5/22/21 | may 22nd, 2021
A few years ago, I was in San Francisco to check out the Google travel offices, where we spent a lot of time geeking out over travel booking data and metrics. one of the stats that stood out for me was that a lot of consumers spend over 40 hours and look at over 20 web sites researching their trip.
When I started planning my first round-the-world trip in 2005, there weren’t as lots of online resources. I remember a blog on backpacking Europe (basically what a girl did on her study abroad and her notes from the road), a couple of online forums, and random web sites here and there.
My trip planning consisted mostly of using guidebooks.
Today, we have 100,000+ blogs, travel forums and online communities, Youtube channels, Instagram pages, apps, and sharing-economy websites, and everything in between.
You can find information for anywhere you want to go.
No destination is too obscure.
There is a figurative firehose of information online.
But, in this sea of limitless information, how do you know what information and recommendations are accurate and trustworthy, especially when so much content is sponsored by companies?
Like you, I spend a lot of time researching destinations before I go. I read blog posts, books, trip reports, hostel reviews, get guidebooks, and leave no stone unturned.
I love digging deep into the places I’m traveling to. It makes the trip seem real and gives me the feeling like I’m unearthing deep secrets.
Planning a trip gives you ownership of your journey. It’s an integral part of the travel experience.
But, considering that I’ve been looking up information online and working in the travel industry for years, I can spot the BS/paid/sponsored content really easily.
There’s a lot of bad information out there that will lead you astray.
And today I want to help you spot it.
(Note: I’m going to break down my thoughts in extreme detail, but it actually doesn’t take that long to process all this. I’ll give you some perspective at the end. It’s not as long as you think!)
Part One: aspects to consider When reading about Destinations
1. Sponsored Content
Whenever I come across an article, I scroll to the bottom to see if it is “sponsored.” Sponsored content is (a) when a blogger is given a trip or product in exchange for a review or mention on that blogger’s website, or (b) content that is generally advertising or marketing material (think some “awesome” contest they are telling you om).
While organized press trips have occurred in the travel service for decades (and I’ve done them), sponsored content is something different.
A press trip is an unpaid experience where writers check out a destination in buy to write about it. In this case, there’s no exchange of money. And, while there’s probably a little quid pro quo, I think when compared to sponsored content, it’s a lot more honest. (I still take press trip content with a grain of salt though).
A sponsored post always has an exchange of money. That’s what changes the dynamic for me. That makes it marketing (for reasons that tie together below). A person was paid specifically to write great things.
I’ll read the post (it still might be useful) but I don’t put as much weight into the recommendations as I would an unsponsored post. After all, the writer was paid to write about the place and there is a natural human inclination to sugarcoat the negatives if we’ve been paid to write about a place or product.
When I see “Thanks for the complimentary trip, (insert tourism board name). All opinions are my own” without explanation, I’m also wary. What was free? What was paid for? Did they receive money? how do I know what is true and what isn’t?
Thus, I’m normally a lot more skeptical of the content unless I see clearly what was sponsored.
When I went to Islay, the tourism board covered a lot of my trip: “Visit Islay supplied the car and accommodation and also connected me to distilleries so I could get the behind-the-scenes excursions for this article. Meals, flights, and transportation to and from the island — as well as all that whisky I gotten — were at my own expense. They did not pay me directly for coverage.”
This is what I look for. I want the author to be clear on what was and wasn’t paid for – because that will directly impact some of the other crucial things to keep an eye.
2. Replicable Experiences
If the writer is writing about an experience that I can’t do or a situation I can’t replicate, the recommendations isn’t beneficial to me as a reader. It’s great that someone got to do something cool like eat at a 3-star Michelin restaurant and cook dinner with the chef — but how does that really help me experience the place?
How will that make my trip better?
Those kinds of articles make for fun stories but nothing more. When I’m researching a destination, I don’t want a fun story. I want a helpful story.
3. in-depth Content
How in-depth is the article? The a lot more facts, figures, and other details they include, the a lot more I know they know their stuff. For me, recommendations that is detailed, practical, and replicable is the best kind of advice. I look for blogs and content that give me insight into a destination or product like I would expect from a guidebook or magazine.
All these signals tell me “This web site has quality and trustworthy content and I must use it to plan my trip.”
This is why whether or not the content is sponsored/branded/whatever term people use is so crucial to me because the a lot more the writer is paying their own way and doing what I would do, it’s a lot more likely to include the nitty-gritty facts and figures that will be beneficial to me as I plan my trip.
4. bigger Picture
I look at that content within the bigger picture of their website. If I come across an post and I like what I’m reading, sponsored or not, I click around the web site a bit more. If this blogger tends to do the kind of activities I like to do, I think to myself, “OK, we have a similar travel style. This person’s recommendations is going to benefit me.”
If I look around a web site and see they mostly pay their own way, have in-depth content, and are in the trenches like the rest of us, I’m ok with the small amount of sponsored content I see because, in my mind, it will be a lot more fair and balanced than someone who does mostly paid trips.
5. web site Appearance
What does their web site look like? Does it look loved? Is the design from 1999, or does it look like someone keeps the site up to date?
While looks don’t 100% correlate to quality food, you’re a lot more likely to go “the food is probably good here” if the restaurant looks like it wasn’t like renovated during the Nixon years.
For example, look at my site:
In 2008:
Nu:
Which one would you depend on more? (Exactly. The newer version.)
6. Are They too Negative?
There are so lots of aspects that go into whether or not you like a destination: the people you meet, the weather, the ease with which you got around, whether someone in your dorm snored, and so much more! When I look at someone’s opinion on a place, I look to see if they are just ranting or are genuinely being fair. “This place was horrible and you must never go” is a rant that must be taken with a grain of salt. read it, file it away, but mostly neglect it.
Years ago, I went on a rant about Vietnam and swore I would never go back. considering that then, I’ve grown as a writer and a person. I had to add a little blurb at the end of the post saying this was my experience but you must go and experience it yourself.
That post stays up because it’s part of the site, but I flinch when I read it. It’s not the type of post that gives an accurate picture of a place nor is it one you must use when you plan your trip. avoid articles like that.
7. timely Content
Lastly, how old is the article? When was it last updated? travel changes so rapidly that an post that was written five years ago and hasn’t been updated considering that is one I don’t value. If the post hasn’t been updated within the last two years, skip it!
Part Two: What to consider When Researching a Company
1. a lot of reviews are Negative
First, when it pertains to using a company or booking web site you don’t know, it’s crucial to remember one thing: the majority of reviews are a lot of likely going to be negative.
Consumers use review sites to complain, not to praise. It’s nearly always how some company screwed them over. While that is often the case (no company is best 100% of the time — and it’s not just obscure companies; I’ve had pals have horrible times trying to get a refund from Expedia), a lot of of the time it’s because someone didn’t read the fine print.
So that’s the most crucial thing to remember: consumer reviews always tilt negative in the travel space, so you shouldn’t be too anxious if a company has too lots of negative reviews (the devil is in the details, not some star rating!).
2. consider Why a review is Negative
When checking out consumer reviews, I look to see why these people are having a negative experience. For example, if a lot of of the negative reviews for a excursion company talk about how their guide didn’t know anything, I begin to think, “Maybe this excursion company isn’t that good.”
But if the negative reviews are mostly “THIS IS the worst company ever because MY hotel WAS only 2 stars and I expected 5 stars FOR THE $500 I PAID!” then I’ll neglect those certain negative reviews.
To me, these kinds of reviews are just rants, not helpful.
3. expert Opinion
What do travel writers, magazines, and newspapers say about this company? Do they match the negative consumer reviews, or do they paint the company in a different light? If excursion company X has tons of negative consumer reviews but the majority of professionals say it is good, I’ll opt for the professional opinion. If thEre er en afbrydelse mellem hvad forbrugerne siger, og hvad flertallet af eksperter siger, jeg er afhængig af eksperterne.
Når det er sagt, vil jeg også se for at sikre, at eksperterne ikke får betalt for at sige, hvad de siger. En masse rejsemagasiner får tilknyttede betalinger eller provisioner fra rejse/turnéfirmaer. Før jeg vejer deres mening, vil jeg dobbeltkontrol for at sikre, at de ikke får betalt for at sige det.
4. Undersøgelse af anmeldelser
Overvej derefter følgende fem point, når du tjekker anmeldelser:
Hvor typisk en korrekturlæserartikler-når jeg tjekker brugergenererede anmeldelser, vil jeg se, hvor typisk en brugerartikler (de fleste websteder viser dig). Hvis nogen artikler bare én gang og skriver en skændende anmeldelse, er chancerne for, at de prøver at lufte, fordi de ikke fik det, de vil.
Pas på for positive anmeldelser-folk kan ikke lide at skade andre menneskers følelser, så på en masse af delingsøkonomiske websteder sukker med deres anmeldelser, fordi disse værter eller guider ikke er et ansigtsløst selskab.
Hvis en person gav dig en udflugt, eller hvis du opholdt sig i nogens hus, og det sugede, vil du føle dig dårlig efterladt en meget negativ anmeldelse, fordi du mødte denne person og dannede et (flygtigt) forhold til dem.
Pas på en mangel på detaljer – Sådan endte jeg i en Airbnb, der var direkte over en bar. Alle sagde ”det var støjende”, men NYC er støjende, så jeg antog bare, at det var, hvad de mente.
Siden den forfærdelige hændelse er jeg kun afhængig af anmeldelser, der er specifikke, detaljer og klare om, hvad der var godt, og hvad der var dårligt. ”Jeg havde en god tid” eller ”Dette sted var det så” fortæller dig ikke noget, og disse anmeldelser skal ignoreres.
Pas på betalte placeringer – Herefter skal du sørge for, at de bedste anmeldelser ikke er betalte placeringer. Størstedelen af bookingwebsteder giver virksomheder mulighed for at betale ekstra for højere eller top “anbefalet” placering. Alle disse topresultater? Normalt betalt for at være der.
Så gør hvad jeg gør: Forsøm de mest anbefalede ejendomme, sorter efter pris og find derefter ud af, hvor man skal booke.
Er der billeder? – Endelig, når jeg ser på bookingwebsteder, kan jeg også godt lide at se, hvilke billeder folk, der har boet der, har sendt. Selvfølgelig er det at have en professionel fotograf tage et billede kontra nogen, der tager et billede med deres telefon, to meget forskellige ting, men jeg kan i det mindste lide at få en fornemmelse af, hvordan rummet ser ud i en ægte verden.
***
Ingen af disse punkter gør eller bryder min planlægning på egen hånd. Jeg ser på alt og ser, hvordan det komplette billede ser ud. Jeg ser efter mønstre og gennemsnit. Det er noget, du ikke rigtig kan falske. afhænger af gennemsnittet.
Dette lyder måske som om det kræver en masse arbejde, men det er virkelig bare en lang, udtrukket skriftlig version af det, jeg husker, når jeg undersøger. I virkeligheden tager denne liste kun et par minutter at løbe igennem i dit hoved.
Ved at se på nogen måde disse faktorer, ender du sjældent på et sted, du ikke kan lide, bruge et firma, der skruer dig over eller får unøjagtige og uhjælpsomme oplysninger.
Sådan rejser du verden på $ 50 om dagen
Min New York Times bedst sælgende paperback-guide til World Travel viser dig, hvordan du mestrer kunsten at rejse, så du kommer fra den slagne vej, sparer penge og har en dybere rejseoplevelse. Det er din A til Z Planning Guide, som BBC kaldte “Bibelen for budgetrejsende.”
Klik her for at lære meget mere og begynde at læse det i dag!
Book din rejse: logistiske ideer og tricks
Book dit fly
Find en billig flyvning ved hjælp af Skyscanner. Det er min foretrukne søgemaskine, fordi den søger på websteder og flyselskaber over hele kloden, så du ved altid, at der ikke er nogen sten, der ikke er vendt.
Book din indkvartering
Du kan bestille dit hostel med Hostelworld. Hvis du vil bo et andet sted end et vandrerhjem, skal du bruge Booking.com, da de konsekvent returnerer de billigste priser for gæstehuse og hoteller.
Glem ikke rejseforsikring
Rejseforsikring vil sikre dig mod sygdom, skade, tyveri og aflysninger. Det er detaljeret beskyttelse, hvis noget går galt. Jeg tager aldrig på en tur uden det, da jeg har været nødt til at bruge det mange gange tidligere